Proof is in the Pudding
By
Jason Leigh
Worldwide television talk shows like 'The Gordon Elliott Show' would not fly someone up to New York City (all expenses paid) to be interviewed about a broad-daylight video of a UFO, if the staff and their video experts at CBS Inc. did not agree that the video does, in fact, show a real, . . UFO.
Home-town newspapers and world-renowned newspapers would not print a story about an undisputed, broad-daylight UFO video, most certainly after the videotape was shown to the reporters, and editors alike.
Network-News would not do a story about a broad-daylight videotape of a UFO by a former professional news photographer, unless and until, their experts had made the call for the realism and news-worthiness of the interview.
A world-renowned Professor of Physics, Professor John C. Kasher of the University of Nebraska at Omaha, would not confide, "My personal opinion is that you had a genuine experience, and are sincere in sharing what you have taped. I think that Jim (Jim Dilettoso, President of Village Labs, Tempe, Arizona) could go a long way in verifying that you have not tampered with the tape, and that the object is what you claim it to be," after he had studied the UFO video for several months.
The Sci-Fi Channels' "Sightings," would not put together a story and show the footage worldwide on January 22, 1997 (show # 58), unless and until, it was verified by their experts, and their staff of Producers did not consider the UFO video worthy of being real enough to present to the public; worldwide . . .
As an honest man and former professional, I would not have researched the video and all of the other facts mentioned within the pages of this series of articles, if I were not 100% sure of what is on the videotape as being a real, UFO, notwithstanding what I had seen in complete awe with my naked-eyes on the night of June the 1st., 1995, and on the sunny afternoon of June the 11th., 1995.
Allow me to publish a verbatim 'out-take' from "The Gordon Elliott Show," which you did not hear, nor see, which was a statement that I had made at the end of what we, on-stage, thought was the "closing remarks" segment:
Gordon: "Do you have anything to add about your video, Jason?"
Jason: "Yes. I would add that my video will stand the test of time."
From the corner of my left eye, I saw Mr. Dilettoso nodding his head to the affirmative, after my answer was uttered. He had studied the video before the show.
Jim Dilettoso, President of Village Labs in Tempe, Arizona, is presently analyzing the UFO video, using not only his 25-plus years of expert testimony and experience, but also, a Super-Computer, and state-of-the-art video equipment--to prove, as an objective, and removed-from-ever-knowing-me-expert, of the video's authenticity.
I was very impressed with both Dr. Jack Kasher and Mr. Jim Dilettoso, having seen them on TV shows expounding the UFO reality, and had it not been for Dr. Kasher, while being interviewed on "Sightings" several years back concerning his findings regarding the NASA footage of many UFOs zipping around the earth, as was filmed in September of 1991 from the crew of the space shuttle Discovery, wherein Dr. Kasher related that he had placed a "transparency" over his TV screen to plot the courses of the UFOs. I incorporated this procedure (nearly two years later) to my broad-daylight UFO video and the nighttime UFOs, adding colored-felt-tipped pens, assigning a color to the various other animate (living) and inanimate (non-living) objects, such as the three birds which fly across the camcorder lens--the two-story house--the clouds--the treetops--the cars driving by--etc., and the UFOs themselves, were all given their own color I.D. markings. Thank you, Professor Kasher. (It kept me busy for quite a while) . . .
When the test results are in (pro or con) from Village Labs' Super-computer and intensive research, those results will be posted on this Website.
A computer-whiz from Fort Worth has informed me, that if the freeze-frame of the broad-daylight UFO equals 20 pixels: A Super-computer can zero-in on each pixel and blow it up to equal 16 or more pixels, on each and every pixel from the original video source! It would then be possible to view things, or markings, which could not have otherwise been seen from the original video. Portholes, could be seen.
I do hope that Village Labs will publish their findings in some of the scientific magazines (because I am very certain what the results will be), and we all should want as many people learning of these findings as is possible.
We have seen the video on various TV-News broadcasts--talk shows and the UFO shows which have thus far aired the footage, and we can "be our own judge" in the matter as individuals--based solely upon what is before our eyes, . . but the objective findings by myself and the other experts who have studied this video of a real, UFO, should carry significant weight in proving what would otherwise be considered; concrete, or physical evidence to the reality of UFOs in general, or at the very least: proof of a real space craft from another world on this video from June 11, 1995. That's when it will graduate from being unidentified, to identified.
One day, I hope and pray that there will be an interest in analyzing the nighttime footage of the amazing gigantic UFO and the smaller UFOs over Cleburne and Fort Worth Texas, zipping downwards at a 90 degree angle--one behind the other, in-formation--along with the one UFO which is clearly seen zipping, upwards . . .
I should not want to repeat myself from the other seven articles written on this Website, therefore, I will close with the promise to you, that my video of the UFOs will stand the test of time, . . when we will all pay witness, to a concerted level, that we have seen real, UFOs, from, . . wherever it is that they come from.
You have my word of honor: I witnessed and videotaped, actual, UFOs . . .
Peace in numbers--Jason
X x X
(c) 1997 by Jason Leigh
