The Government Keeps Making Excuses
Regarding the existence of UFOs
By
Jason Leigh
Perhaps they would choose not to lie to us, but to simply; avoid the truth.
We all love our countries, and we support them, we nurture them (as best as we can--given to our respective limitations), and we are willing to lay-down our lives for our liberties (?), which is based upon and run by--our Government.
Since the turn of this century (20th) and the dawning of the 'Industrial Age,' greed and the lust for money have been the driving-forces behind all of capitalism, which has now been spread to all but a few countries within this blue-planet and with this stated 'greed for money' comes--the darkest side of all evils: the thirst for more . . .
If the American military can spend trillions of our tax dollars (yes, not millions--not billions, but 'trillions') on 'black projects,' such as the B-1 Bomber, SDI (Star Wars Defense Initiative) or yet, the, "Rail-Gun," used in the, "Star-Wars," package, then wouldn't you think that keeping the entire UFO phenomenon a mass of confusion with 'blacked-out-pages' from, "Official Documents," and of, "disinformation--colored with some truth--now and then," a rationale for keeping the lid on it? It is expensive enough for 'them' to even spy on one person--let alone the undertaking of a phenomenon with such major implications, which could, and possibly, would change the entire structure of what has been worked so hard at attaining for almost 100 years now?
I believe that this is very much the case: If you mix facts with failures of some details, which would then relate to the subject, then what you get is factual information, which is but 'laced' with--confusion: A paradox. (Paradox: A statement seemingly absurd or contradictory, yet in fact--true).
You would then have to come-up with 'falsehoods' and 'truths' to keep the 'paradox' growing, as the world changes and the thinking people within it--change.
First came the infamous, "Roswell: Closed Subject," based upon 'blacked-out' documents, which covered the (obviously) most important aspects to this factual evidence with news of a "Weather Balloon," then came yet another, "Roswell: Case Closed," exuding the 'human-like dummies,' which weren't actually being dropped until 5 years after the Roswell incident, explained away as some sort of, "time compression," which we all believed? You did believe that, now--didn't you?
But it seems that as soon as the public-pressure is applied to the degree that the number of concerned people show an upward curve, yet another 'new' explanation develops as if it were found hiding under someone's desk, like a misplaced bill for something you no longer have. There have been dozens of explanations since 1947.
Therefore, why should we be surprised by anything that the government may tell us, if we have been 'conditioned' into believing that what they say is 'written in stone,' until the next series of the continuing saga becomes more of the same--that we are expected to believe, or: you just may be asking for tax-audits, loss of VA benefits, loss of your job, loss of a loved one, loss of Social Security payments, wire-taps on your telephone, bugging your computer with re-routed email being copied and perhaps--sent-on, or any other form of fear that would and could suppress such persons, or person, trying to further the quest for the truth of truths. It is like demanding that the government prove, beyond a shadow of a doubt, that not only is there really a 'GOD,' and how can you PROVE that in him; "WE TRUST." Recall that every coin, every paper bill of currency--has those words engraved, or printed upon it--for a reason: We (The USA) trust in God.
In closing, if the United States government came-out now and told us that, "Roswell really happened," but that the records must have been destroyed to protect--whatever, and that UFOs are indeed real--based upon a captured ship and bodies--miles of photographs, films and videos: would we then--believe, or could this be yet another ploy to assert the beginnings of a different--paradox?
BTW: I do not legally speak for the U.S. Government. I only tell you--what they can not.
I urge you to--think about this. The answer's coming . . .
Peace in numbers--Jason
X x X
(c) August 17, 1997 07:20 a.m. CDT
By Jason Leigh
