Why There Are UFO "Debunkers"
(Top Secret)
By
Jason Leigh
UFOs. "Unidentified Flying Objects."50 years since this term was first used, it has now become synonymous with something more easily defined: "Flying Saucers--from another world."
For those of you who have seen these elusive objects; first-hand, or for those of you who were fortunate enough to have filmed or photographed these otherwise, impossible to fathom objects: that was when the "unbelievable," became the, "believable," upon that fateful day, or upon that fateful night, for you, too.
But then there came those who would attempt to undermine the reports, sworn testimonies and photographs of the purported UFOs, which had, by that time, already become "news" in its own right. Were 'they' (the Debunkers) trying to make a name for themselves by trying to disprove the evidence and thereby "steal the thunder" from those people who had actually seen, . . the UFOs? 'Big possibility there. "Debunkers" seek out the media and "exposure" for themselves, whenever there seems to be a "hot" UFO sighting, and or video. It's a fact.
These Debunkers have their place, however. It is their job (just ask them) to save us all from the "crack-pots" who would perpetrate a hoax with trick photography, fishing wire and dishonest reports of a "sighting." Therefore, it is difficult for me to be critical of them, given also to the fact that I have tried to contact the two most notable 'Debunkers' in the U.S., by sending them e-mails and "attachments" of my "Reports," and, "Factual Findings," and I have received; not a word in reply. I had even sent the 'Grand-Daddy' of all UFO Debunkers, Mr. Phil Klass, 'snail-mailed' copies of these same reports. I'm still waiting for a response--almost two years later, about as long ago as when I sent the same information to The White House.
Disproving photographs of "pie-pans-on-a-string" from as far back as the late 1940's, and on into the 1980's, was simple enough with careful study, but disproving the "real" reports, photographs and videotape, has been another matter, because these real and "obvious" UFOs were just not being brought to the public by the major media, until, possibly, in some cases, several years passed until the topic had settled down enough to make the public wonder: "Well, there; you see! If the guy had a 'real UFO' video, why did he wait over two or three years until he 'went-public'?" 'Are you starting to get the over-all picture here now?
* The creditable witnesses and the real photographs and videotapes are suppressed long enough to create a doubt in the collective mind of the public, to blame the person alleging the "sighting," as opposed to the real guilty parties: The Major, Mass Media. Why on Earth would they do that? To keep "The story of the millennium" from the taxpayers--and the entire World?
Well, the F.C.C. (Federal Communications Commission) is a branch of the U.S. Government. Radio and TV stations must comply with the F.C.C. Rules and Regulations (The Standards In Practice), and all of these stations must obtain, . . an Operations License, or, at the drop of a hat: this license can be suspended by the Government. "Just make-up a reason," they could order, if you get my drift. Having personally worked in Television News: I have seen it threatened, and I have seen it happen . . .
If you have seen TV talk shows wherein there are "average, every day-people" on the stage, who either saw, or photographed a UFO with these well-trained, well spoken, defiantly deflating 'Debunkers', then you saw that the poor 'average people' didn't stand a chance against these guys. The Debunkers come across with such outspoken authority (as if they were working for the 'Under-Cover' Government), that you can see, if you look closely enough; the hate in their eyes--as they utter their words of misleading "probabilities" as an answer to the, "sighting."
Have you ever asked a child what they wanted to be when they grew-up? Have you ever heard one say, "I want to be a 'UFO Debunker,' not a Fireman." Naw, me either. My dad used to always tell me (when he asked that question of me), that no matter what I wanted to be when I grew-up, that I should always strive to be an honest person, stay out of trouble and accept my civic responsibilities. Of course, Dad wanted me to be President of the United States, too.
So, there seems to be a logical, protective aspect to the role of being a 'Debunker,' in that they will never improve and be true to themselves, nor to their quests, until they learn that some evidence: MUST ONE DAY LEAD THEM TO THE TRUTH, AND THEY MUST THEREBY LEARN TO ACCEPT THAT THE 'IMPOSSIBLE' CAN, IN POINT-OF-FACT, BE FOUND TO BE THE, 'POSSIBLE,' FOR THERE IS NOTHING, THAT IS NOT, 'POSSIBLE.'
* * Remember: Only a few decades ago, the skeptics proclaimed that a "test-tube-baby" was most certainly: impossible. 'Tell that now to the young woman (conceived in this manner) who is among us and lives a normal, human life. And remember also, that the skeptics, 100 years ago, told the Wright Brothers that they would, "Never get that thing off of the ground." 'Super Sonic flight to France, . . anyone? How about circling the Earth in a Space Shuttle, or sending a smart 'skate-board' to Mars? 'What will our descendants say about us, . . 100 years from now?
I'll close with this historical fact: THE DENISON DAILY NEWS OF JANUARY 24TH., 1878: A Mr. John Martin, a farmer living near Denison, Texas, was reported as having seen a dark object high in the southern sky. He describes the wonderful speed with which it flew and when it came directly overhead, "It was about the size of a large 'saucer' and was evidently at a great height." The newspaper concluded the account by describing Mr. Martin as a gentleman of, "undoubted veracity, and this strange occurrence, if it was not a balloon, deserves the attention of our scientists." ***
'Would that this day and age of 119 years later (September 12, 1997) that there could be such a man of complete, "veracity," that such action would be taken so seriously as to have, "scientists," consider the matter???
Peace in numbers--Jason
X x X
(c) 1997 by Jason Leigh
